Of course you can throw shoes Ma Ying-jeou, everyone has freedom of speech; But to lose belief and

Of course you can throw shoes Ma Ying-jeou, everyone has freedom of speech; But to lose belief and not manipulated by any interested parties. Ma Ying-jeou took office, to withstand numerous condemning, of course, many of them sound advice, but most of it is just personal attacks. Honestly, I have nothing against him special favor, patek but I could not understand very deliberate manipulation of interested parties, as well as people rush to anti-horse attitude. patek Must adopt so extreme, so Yinhen words, is the criticism you? Rational patek and peace, do not I? Have gone through so many presidents, and after a simple comparison, do you really think that Ma Ying-jeou particularly bad? Indeed, the Ma administration is not perfect, but in the administrative efficiency and execution, and to say he was bad, unless you are completely forgetful, forget the past and the old KMT era, as well as the ruling DPP government for eight years, is how to bureaucratic delays to suppress dissidents, stir up ethnic tensions, economic revitalization would shout slogans and raved Zhengming de-China diplomatic Trek thwarted at every step, but the United Nations back in Taiwan in the international singing even fart did not dare put. At that time the government really better than okay now? I just graduated from National Chengchi University, Chen Shui-bian was first elected president. Billing when I watch TV in eastern Taipei dinner, surrounded by a lot of people patek say that Taiwan finished, my heart does not agree, then I am filled with joy and anticipation Bian. Bian first open presidential news conference, held on the grass, but also has a vibrant spectacular, patek I really think that both enjoy and send and expectations. But eight years later, on DU, Hsieh Chuang, Redshirts build Kay Road, corruption suspicions intensified, patek frustration and anger in my heart already peaked. Cheng pulls back, I do not think the Ma administration has so rotten. Yes, he has a lot to improve. However, regardless of right and wrong, regardless of the historical patek context, all governments should generally take the horse, it's really stupid. Taiwanese years by blue-green cross stimulus, as if every few days to be fed Viagra, do not tired? Why bother abuse passion? patek Calm little bar! Taiwanese! Why is it so easy to be manipulated? Why not think about the blood of youth, only to follow swarm "horse" trend, since that protest is "cynical" is assertive; has forgotten the true wisdom, is not whether you support patek the government, but you stand in the truth of that party. If the protest became the object being manipulated, patek and you still standing there a big noise, this is not called "independent thinking" but "grandstanding." In all fairness, I think that the Macedonian Government to do a lot. One day, history will back his fair evaluation. Taiwan's current problem is not that the Government is incompetent, but people who are interested manipulation. While they use a phony issue, playing double-dealing, stuck on the other side of injustice, then stood hypocrites suppress discredit the party masses, let the other dilemma. Really, society has progressed, the economy is recovering, and I do not know why so many people are still shouting government incompetence, poor governance. I am a soldier when Chen Shui-bian administration, economic growth was negative 3%, is now at least 1-2% ... yes, grow not by much, but you can not deny that this is a "positive growth." Some people criticized the soaring patek prices. How, the economic recovery is not the price you? Does it not also been speculation patek out of ideas do? Over the past decades, Taiwan's economy has been growing, inflation is also from never stopped. I was a kid house a few hundred patek thousand, and now a few tens of millions. patek Child a bowl of $ 25, now $ 80. Rising prices for consumers is bad, but there is need for the industry. How can you as a boss, prices are not allowed to sell things, how the cost burden? Inflation has always been a by-product of economic growth, the problem is a moderate rise in commodity prices, or volatility, as long as the stable, that is not a bad thing. Experienced so many presidents, and why past inflation OK, but today condemning repeatedly? Is not nobody in the past (dare) hype, now open and democratic, the hype more people, you can use price as a lever to achieve political objectives, and therefore government was scolded smelly head? Ma Ying-jeou has indeed done a bad place, but it is not bad to the point. Why does everyone call him rotten? Just because no matter what happens, we are accustomed to an ancient brain blame on him? The people of Taiwan, will not be too headstrong little? Will not be too critical thinking skills without some? When those people are abusive Ma Ying-jeou as "Jellyfish" when my heart really want to ask, what is "wrong, but still insist on doing things" government patek hydrocephalus, or they clearly saw the country's progress, but still rely on the spur of the moment emotional criticism the heads of the people without brain? Who is the jellyfish? General insight to see clearly; just very few people dare to offend the masses. Negotiation patek and signing of ECFA, when opposition parties criticize the progress of stagnation, success still cursing, signing ineffective even derided. How now, how many people will benefit from this agreement? Tasted the sweetness of it quietly enjoy an encounter lambasted the problem, which is the virtue of the people of Taiwan do? Hung Chung Confucius was ill, delay of Military Justice does not pass, blame Ma administration? That past presidents do not reform, why not blame? GATS agreement behind closed doors, blame Ma administration? Past Darmstadtium shock case, the outbreak of the South Line project, which one is more black than GATS agreement? GATS agreement, while not perfect, but they were all benefiting many industries. Beneficiaries still silently Anshuang, manipulated by those who are making use of the impact of the public, the GATS criticized useless. Then, when everyone is going around the world to open at the same time, Taiwan's economic future to go where? Right! Anyway, now the Macedonian Government signed GATS reviled not to sign him, until the Taiwanese economy is poor and are more subject to continue curse! Scolded the government patek to do something he did not, do not scold him for incompetence later, we have to say that this kidnapping government really means to manipulate public opinion brilliant idea! Illegal eavesdropping, blame Ma administration? Monitoring mechanisms will be alone twelve patek presidents will cultivate out of it? Does the past did not do such a mechanism? Contrast, the Heads of State of the United States for the listener, it not all countries because of human rights violations spying secrets patek norm? Of course, the need to respect human rights; But why events can eventually evolve into "Guan said," all of them suspects patek at large, and have actually disgraced law enforcement, was to discredit revenge, finally had to step down? This is the Taiwanese people's right and wrong do? Black-food chain explosion, blame Ma administration? We eat for decades, successive governments have perceptible past you? We do not blame the past government incompetence Whistleblower, actually blame the problem spread in the sun today under the Ma administration, which is not upside down, not sure who is the enemy? Ma Ying-jeou just flak, be treated as political struggles those objectives. Or to say, we had high expectations for him, once unable to achieve the desired objectives, the greater the sense of loss. However, it should look a little discerning, Ma Ying-jeou is also not worse than ever next president. All day asking patek him to step down, how he stepped down, who can do better than him? Who is responsible for the future of Taiwan? Those people do all day would only curse? I doubt very much! To criticize, to criticize Taiwan's common enemy. U.S. beef imports mandatory, why not criticize the U.S. AIT or New York? Chinese annexation of Taiwan, conspiracy, why not criticize China Hong Kong or Beijing? Philippines bully Taiwanese, why not give unfurled protest in Manila? Japanese occupation Diaoyutai, why did not people go to Tokyo smashing eggs demonstrations? Taiwan, South Korea suppress discredit, bully we taekwondo national champion, and even hostile takeover Taiwan's online game industry, why is no one to build streets of Seoul, and then show China Gas loud choking sound? Datong Flavor new feed with the top Taiwanese eat rotten fool decades blending oil, why nobody boycott, consumers refuse to buy, let them all go bankrupt? Dare to insult one of us, called extreme weakness. Rarity punches, called dastardly! Just because we are scolded, patek along with his curse, called parrot. I think that Taiwan's current opinion ignorance, rooted in this. In short, it is called ignorance. Everyone has the freedom of expression, and true democracy, that is, "Even if I do not agree with you, but I defend your right to speak." So, I respect every pair of shoes are lost to Ma Ying-jeou. Just sincerely hope that these shoes are really to defend patek the ideals patek and beliefs and lost. Do not be manipulated by interested parties, anxious confusion due to the pace, and even their very suspect threw fake issue. Taiwanese need to get rid of blind emotion, really started thinking, who is the manipulation of society interested parties. You can throw shoes Ma Ying-jeou, but lost for the faith!
Out of context, Intention is innocent poetry Kong Mengsi point, speaking of three hundred East Qin and Han era guidelines. "The kings so the couple, as honor, thick human relations, the United States enlightenment, transfer customs," the source of chaos cloud Talking? Your article clearly says: In the "Do not manipulated by any interested parties" in the case, the shoes can be "true to defend the ideals and beliefs lost" and you therefore "respect for each pair of shoes being thrown at Ma Ying-jeou." patek That you are in a way to support (or did not support but respect) throw shoes this behavior, so understanding should be right. As to whether the assault shoe lost freedom, and thus violated Article VIII of the ROC Constitution, it seems completely outside the range moderators your consideration. But if the moderators do not mean I understand, I really do not understand exactly what moderators meaning of these words? Purely rational dignitaries peace, do not blame everything Macedonian Government? Moderators do not think your article easy to play opposite effect? Throw shoes this one hands (and feet) behavior really belongs to "the right to speak"? Speech, teaching, writing and publishing, the first two moving mouth, the latter two I hand my mouth, is not an infringement of the freedom of bodily violence. Throw shoes? Mouth throw shoes? Do not throw shoes mouth violent? You respect the freedom patek of assault violence?
Gentleman than hands, tongue and hands-on patek difference in what? Hands can be regarded as "speech"? ROC Constitution Article VIII: People bodily freedom shall be guaranteed. In addition to case of flagrante delicto separately by law, the non-judicial or police authorities according to legal procedures, shall not be arrested or detained. And Article 11: The people shall have freedom of speech, teaching, writing and publishing of freedom. President patek of the Republic of China as well as local civil servants patek at all levels of the central People's Republic of China is not part of a part? If approved throw this one hands-on shoes act as freedom of speech, patek then throw shoes whether the conduct assault patek of freedom? The provisions of the Constitution would not contradictory? Or depending on whether the body be thrown into each other? Should throw shoes do have freedom in danger of assault, this behavior is that the spot flagrante delicto arrest? "Of course you can throw shoes Ma Ying-jeou, everyone has freedom patek of speech," moderator before saying this, in the end did not think clearly? You obviously this sentence unconstitutional!
4th floor. GolfNut
When we all hope Ma Ying-jeou to solve the various issues patek they care about when Ma Ying-jeou is destined to be scolded good article! When we all hope Ma Ying-jeou to solve the various issues they care about when Ma Ying-jeou is destined to be scolded. When Wang Xuan Ma incompetent curse because vegetative every six people to a toilet: Wang Xuan yesterday "vegetable, like the toilet," an article on the Ministry of Interior limiting the proportion of disability organizations toilet every six people to a toilet, still very unhappy. He pointed out that vegetative urine are resolved in bed, why so many toilets do? After the Ministry of the Interior has been questioned, but "refuses to admit," less a toilet must be reduced six vegetative state, but living in a nursing home in a vegetative state are from low-income families, the government can not afford to accept, but also for nursing homes fine, he criticized the social administration officials "otherworldly", "behind closed doors." Wang Xuan said that similar widespread discontent, incompetent officials, hat, soon to jeou buckle body, "presidential patek polls only a dozen lying is not without reason," President Ma pursuit of historical orientation, although there are more than three years of their term of office, But his historical position, and now has roughly determines that the word "incompetent." That year, then Chen Wang Xuan dare? That is the outspoken. patek
Featured Posts